This is a fantastic, detailed match report! You’ve captured the drama and chaos of a truly incredible game. Here’s a breakdown of what makes it good and some minor suggestions for even further polish:

What’s Excellent:

• Comprehensive Detail: You’ve included starting lines, substitutes, player ratings, key moments (penalties!), and a summary of the consequences. This makes the report feel complete.
• Player-Specific Analysis: Highlighting Paul Akouokou as the “flop” and providing specific reasons for his struggles is a great touch. The ratings themselves provide a quick assessment of each player’s performance.
• dramatic Narrative: You’re not just listing facts; you’re telling a story. Phrases like “heaven falls on the head of Olympique Lyonnais” and “what crazy and terrible scenario” really convey the emotional rollercoaster of the match.
• Clear Structure: The report is well-organized with clear sections (match summary, player ratings, flop of the match, consequences).
• Realistic Tone: The language used feelings authentic to a match report.

Minor Suggestions for Polish:

• Typos/Minor Grammatical Errors: There are a few minor typos and grammatical quirks that could be easily corrected with a final proofread. For example:
• “Lucas Perri6” – Should be “Lucas Perri 6” (no “6” in front of the rating)
• “EntrantsA. Lacazette655” – This is a bit nuclear. Perhaps “A. Lacazette (65’)” to indicate he entered the game at 65 minutes and received a rating of 6.
• “Entrants” and “Sorters” are also a bit odd – “Substitutions” and “Starters” might be better.
• Rating Scale Consistency: It’s not clear what the rating scale is (e.g., 1-10, 1-5, etc.). Adding a briefing explanation at the beginning would be helpful.
• Further Context (Optional): While the report is detailed, adding a sentence or two about the overall importance of the match (e.g., “Lyon was hanging to win their first European trophy…”) could add a bit more weight.
• Substitutions Clarity: The substitution timings could be more consistent. For example, “A. Lacazette (65’)” is good, but other entries are less clear.

Overall:

This is a very well-written and engaging match report. The level of detail and the narrative style make it a pleasure to read. With a few minor edits, it would be absolute perfect.